Pages

Showing posts with label Viagra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Viagra. Show all posts

Thursday, April 8, 2010

Viagra for Sex Offenders Coming Soon to a Health Benefit Exchange Near You

Readers may recall  Senator Coburn's amendment to the reconciliation sidecar legislation that would prevent sex offenders from receiving taxpayer funded Viagra and other erectile drug therapies. Politico posted the text of the amendment March 23rd, noting Republicans were doing their best to derail the reconciliation package by forcing Democrats to take some hard votes to avoid sending the bill back to the House:
No Erectile Dysfunction Drugs To Sex Offenders – This amendment would enact recommendations from the Government Accountability Office to stop fraudulent payments for prescription drugs prescribed by dead providers or, to dead patients. This amendment also prohibits coverage of Viagra and other ED medications to convicted child molesters, rapists, and sex offenders, and prohibits coverage of abortion drugs. (Note: the creation of exchanges could allow sex offenders to receive taxpayer-funded Viagra and other ED drugs unless Congress expressly prohibits this action – see additional background attached)
No one appears to have taken Coburn's warning very seriously and it was too much to hope they read the additional background material Coburn provided.  The amendment failed in a 57-42 vote and was later described as ""a crass political stunt aimed at making 30-second (political) commercials.”" by Senator Max Baucus.  Baucus further suggested the amendment made a "mockery" of a serious bill.  Baucus might want to rethink which was the serious bill and which was the "mockery."  Both Roll Call and Fox News  report on a Congressional Research Service memo that confirms there is indeed nothing in the new law that would prevent sex offenders from receiving Viagra through taxpayer subsidized health benefit exchanges just as Coburn warned:
The CRS said there are no provisions in the new health care law "which would require health plans to limit the type of benefits that can be offered based on the plan beneficiary's prior criminal convictions."

"Additionally, there do not appear to be any provisions that would specifically restrict qualified health plans' coverage of drugs prescribed to treat ED," the memo read.

"Therefore, a convicted rapist, child molester, or other sex offender who is not incarcerated would not appear to be excluded from enrolling in a qualified health plan through an American Health Benefit Exchange in their state solely because of that conviction," the memo added.
Senate Democrats failed in their efforts to spare the House another vote.  Was it all worth it, the second House vote passed with more of a whimper than a bang.   Now it seems the Democrats are the ones who are left to sort out the sordid details of their own bill.  Does that amendment vote still look good in the light of day?   I'll bet not, though Democrats aren't likely to admit regrets for having chosen the blue pill.  The deed is done and Democrats now face what is bound to be the world's longest "walk of shame."  Expect the video sometime before November.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Erectile Dysfunction Drugs for Sex Offenders: It's a Good Thing!

Via Memeorandum
Politico has the text of an amendment introduced by Senator Tom Coburn as part of the  GOP strategy to force Democrats to make some awful votes (in an election year) just to avoid sending the health care bill back to the House for another vote.   Senator Coburn gets serious props for the creativity put into this amendment:
No Erectile Dysfunction Drugs To Sex Offenders – This amendment would enact recommendations from the Government Accountability Office to stop fraudulent payments for prescription drugs prescribed by dead providers or, to dead patients. This amendment also prohibits coverage of Viagra and other ED medications to convicted child molesters, rapists, and sex offenders, and prohibits coverage of abortion drugs. (Note: the creation of exchanges could allow sex offenders to receive taxpayer-funded Viagra and other ED drugs unless Congress expressly prohibits this action – see additional background attached)
Watching Democrats vote against a ban on coverage of erectile dysfunction prescription drugs for rapists might be just the group therapy we need while we wait for the Supreme Court challenges to begin.  I have to applaud the inclusion of a provision to prohibit fraudulent prescriptions being written by dead providers to dead patients.  Lovely ads those will make this year when Senator Blanche Lincoln casts her vote against this masterful amendment.

Allahpundit  makes an excellent point as he explains what's in store for Democrats:
So anything the GOP proposes — anything — they’re basically bound to vote no on. And Coburn knows it. One tasty shinola sandwich, coming up! Although I’m confused: If, as the left has convinced itself, ObamaCare is pure win for them politically (see, e.g., today’s ridiculously overhyped Gallup poll), what’s the aversion to another House vote? In fact, why not ping-pong the bill back and forth between the chambers for another month, loading it up with ever more crowd-pleasing amendments? It’s time to own the glorious political victory that looms in November, liberals.
 Democrats should relish the opportunity to cast another vote for the still wildly unpopular health care bill they dare the GOP to make an issue of in the midterm elections.  Can we play poker with these liberals sometime?    How long before we see a Hitler finds out Harry Reid supports Viagra for Rapists parody?  The over/under for the “Why does Harry Reid want to give rapists erections”? video is two days after this vote.  I'd expect the Hitler parody to hit about the same time.
Related Posts with Thumbnails
 
Web Analytics