Contrast Sargent's hard-hitting investigative reporting with that of The Philadelphia Inquirer" report on "threats" to Congressman Patrick Murphy (D PA-8) after he voted for the health care legislation last week:
U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy has received threats since voting for the health-care overhaul last Sunday night but there have been no acts of vandalism against his home or his district offices, a spokeswoman for the congressman said today.The very last line of the Inquirer report adds, "Local police said they had no recent reports of vandalism at Murphy's district offices in Bristol Borough and Doylestown Borough, nor at his home." Funny how that works out, no police report, no hard-hitting investigative journalism.
Kate E. Hansen declined to disclose details of the incidents, which she said are under investigation by the FBI and the Capitol Police, the agency charged with protecting members of Congress.
"It's being handled," Hansen said.
The report goes on to mention the "flurry of threats" and includes a quote from Rep. Bob Brady (D PA) who is "a little worried about people going home now - there are going to be a lot of town hall meetings." It will come as no surprise to Patrick Murphy's constituents there would be no quote from Murphy let alone one referencing town hall meeting. Murphy only conducts town halls via telephone with the able assistance of the AARP. Still, one wonders, did the Inquirer attempt to obtain a quote from Murphy and why the inclusion of one from Brady. Is Brady an easier "get" now that Murphy has been given the nod for a seat on the Appropriations Committee vacant since the death of his mentor John Murtha?
It would be shocking had there been any credible reports to police of acts of vandalism or violence to Congressman Murphy's offices or residence. His constituents fully expected him to vote with Speaker Pelosi as he always does. Still, Congressman "Patlosi," as he is known locally, mentioned listening to thousands of his constituents when announcing his decision to vote for the bill despite the obstructionist strategies by national tea party groups evidently designed solely to prevent Murphy from hearing from constituents who opposed the health care bill. Murphy's spokesperson Kate Hansen explained their phones were jammed with tea party phone calls when pressed for an explanation why constituents who opposed the bill were unable to get through to voice concern:
"These calls are not organic and are being organized by a number of different national tea party activist groups that are executing an obstructionist strategy to deliberately prevent offices from functioning as they're supposed to (and) be able to accept feedback from constituents."We are asked to believe then only pro-reform calls and inorganic tea party calls got through to Murphy's office. These are the pro forma explanations Congressman Murphy's constituents have come to expect and are rarely disappointed.
Further complicating Murphy's ability to listen to his constituents was a power failure that forced his Doylestown PA office to close for several hours the Monday prior to the vote. You can read this on the sign posted on the door to his office quite plainly thanks to the light shining behind the sign. I guess tea party folks in Florida and Texas were behind that obstruction as well.
To say that Hansen and Murphy have something of a credibility problem is a bit of an understatement. Still, Murphy's alleged threats get none of the scrutiny that Cantor's statement enjoys. Cantor's office had a bullet penetrate the window at some trajectory and the left all but calls on Arlen Specter to reassemble the Warren Commission.
Congressman Murphy, through his spokesperson, advances another vaporous threat, without a shred of evidence, as contribution to the growing liberal narrative those who oppose health care are dangerous. The media laps it up and regurgitates without question. Never let it be said Murphy isn't doing his part for the cause. This is a fact that is widely known locally. Murphy doesn't concern himself with local opinion, however, his loyalty is saved for Nancy Pelosi. Murphy will be richly rewarded after having proven himself loyal and every bit as worthy as John Murtha to fill that coveted seat on the Appropriations Committee. It would be a pity if Democrats "jumped the gun" and presumed Murphy re-elected before voters have their say in November.









