Pages

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Pumpkin Carving With Flair

H/T: Creative Minority Report

Forget what I said last year about getting yourself a pumpkin carving kit, grab your revolver and have a blast. This YouTube video explains all:



Got that? Of course if you prefer a more intricate design, you might want to try some of these designs - sans revolver- natch:





From the "how's that working out for you" files: Halloween edition

I was looking for a few ideas for a Halloween post and I happened upon  this post, "Best Political Halloween Costume."  The post was old, dating way back back to the days before the country elected Barack Obama president.  *Sigh*  Hope and change fever was still rampant, which led to the creation of a simple costume that looked like this:

Which brings me to a pertinent question:
HOW'S THAT WORKING OUT FOR YOU?

Hmm, which of Obama's incredible economic policies made Halloween, or anything for that matter, more affordable?  Maybe this guy got one of those magical shovel-ready jobs.

Assuming few of us are reaping the benefits of Obamanomics, here is a simple solution for those who still can't afford a Halloween costume.  Follow the instructions provided by creator of the above-pictured masterpiece and create your own political t-shirt/costume:
Photoshop + Printer + Wilton t shirt iron-on paper = political message

See you at the big party in West Hollywood! Happy Halloween!

A quickie cell phone shot of the shirt in action, which already got me some dirty looks from the old white people at CostCo. Seriously, people. Ease up with the racism!
Wow, had that racism thing ready to go didn't he?  Notice too, the faulty liberal math at work here.  Since when do Photoshop + printer + Wilton t-shirt iron-on paper add up to a political message.  Shouldn't the equation read Photoshop + printer + Wilton t-shirt iron-on paper + catchy political message = clever Halloween costume?  Silly Progressives!

There is a Halloween challenge brewing somewhere in here, I fear.  Feel free to leave your "catchy political message" in the comments if you are so inspired.  The winner gets an all expenses paid trip to 7-11; the Slurpee is on me.

Happy Halloween

Friday, October 29, 2010

Remember November: "That's what elections are for"

H/T: Fuzislippers on Facebook

I mentioned this the other day, but it bears repeating, it was Obama himself who reminded us "what elections are for:"
"If we're unable to resolve differences over health care, we will need to move ahead on decisions," he said, alluding to using reconciliation, a controversial maneuver that prevents a GOP filibuster by requiring only 51 votes to pass legislation.

Obama added that if voters are unhappy with results, then "that's what elections are for."
Fuzislippers sums up my reaction to Obama's arrogance: "The role of government is not to do whatever the hell it pleases and THEN have voters weigh in during an election . . . after the damage is done. What the hell is that?"  What the hell indeed.  Months after the reckless Democrats had their day of wreckoning, voters will finally have their say.  Still the elitists, who told us they knew better than we did, can't wrap their head around the the tidal wave headed their way:
“It’s absurd. We’ve lost our minds,” Kerry said. “We’re in a period of know-nothingism in the country, where truth and science and facts don’t weigh in. It’s all short-order, lowest common denominator, cheap-seat politics.”
  Speak for yourself there Senator Lurch, we haven't lost our minds, nor are we stuck in Iraq due to our "know-nothingness."  We're a bit less than "non-impressed" with your science and facts and cheap-seat politics.  So while Kerry, Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi strut and fret their hour upon the stage, we the voters are working to make it the final hour.   We know "what elections are for" and Tuesday is "The Final Act:"


Remember November: The Final Act from Republican Governors Association on Vimeo.


Ruby Slippers Joins the Marines

They have the best uniforms, don't they?  My ruby slippers would look great with that little outfit in the poster too.  Well, since I might be a tad too old for the Marines and the little costume, I am joining the Marine team, in support of this year's Project Valour-IT.    Yes, it is that time of year again and I am proud to play even a small part in raising money for this very worthwhile cause:

"Project Valour-IT, in memory of SFC William V. Ziegenfuss, helps provide voice-controlled/adaptive laptop computers and other technology to support Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines recovering from hand wounds and other severe injuries. Technology supplied includes:

Voice-controlled Laptops - Operated by speaking into a microphone or using other adaptive technologies, they allow the wounded to maintain connections with the rest of the world during recovery.
Wii Video Game Systems - Whole-body game systems increase motivation and speed recovery when used under the guidance of physical therapists in therapy sessions (donated only to medical facilities).
Personal GPS - Handheld GPS devices build self-confidence and independence by compensating for short-term memory loss and organizational challenges related to severe TBI and severe PTSD."

Come on you jackwagons - Give till it hurts!


learn more


More from the loud and proud Marine team:

Villainous Company "All gave some. Some, gave all."

Cassy Fiano Ten reasons to support the Marines

Stix Blog

More from Stix Blog USMC Silent Drill Platoon

A Little Pink in a World of Camo

Soldiers Angels Germany

The C Square

Miss Ladybug

Something...and half of something

The Pirates Cove

Cubachi

My halls of Montezuma

Pundit and Pundette


Hell in a Handbasket


learn more


Wednesday, October 27, 2010

CNN mocks Obama's Slurpee-car-in-the-ditch spiel

Via Breitbart:

I couldn't resist posting this one fellow Slurpee sippers, couldn't resist. Having a few years of classroom experience as a catechist under my belt, this riff always reminded me of the one kid in every class who gets a huge laugh with a fart joke from a discriminating audience of fourth-graders. Fueled by their audience reaction, the clown then never knows when to stop. That seems to be Obama's overwhelming problem as president though isn't it? He didn't take the resounding message from Scott Brown's election to heart. Instead, he proceeded to push the health care agenda, driving his credibility as a pragmatist and his huge majorities in Congress right over the cliff. "That's what elections are for," he rationalized:
"If we're unable to resolve differences over health care, we will need to move ahead on decisions," he said, alluding to using reconciliation, a controversial maneuver that prevents a GOP filibuster by requiring only 51 votes to pass legislation.

Obama added that if voters are unhappy with results, then "that's what elections are for."

Be sure to keep a celebratory Slurpee on hand next Tuesday as Obama appears poised to get an earful from those unhappy voters.



Teacher's Unions "Gone Wild"

Another explosive Breitbart expose, this time with the teachers union in the crosshairs. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie responds to the revelations contained in the three-part video release that captures NJ teachers and their union leaders in compromising positions:
Gov. Chris Christie comments on 'teachers unions gone wild'
Part One of the series is embedded below.  Parts two and three can be viewed here.  Warning, there is a good deal of foul language from the mouths of these NJ teachers contained in these tapes:

 

Most tellingly, the only defense offered by the teachers and their unions is to discredit James O'Keefe who most of you will remember from the Acorn pimp and prostitute undercover investigation.  Yes, O'Keefe has taken one investigation a bit too far since his Acorn series but that does little to discredit the revelations in this expose.  I would expect the teachers involved here have quite a bit of explaining to do no matter what anyone says about O'Keefe.  The NJEA isn't offering any explanations though, they're sticking to blaming O'Keefe:
The videos show people identified as teachers talking about how difficult it is to fire a tenured teacher, and laughing about playing arcade games "on their dime."

"There was no acting going on," said Cory. "Individuals, just common citizens went in and were able to capture this audio and video by just striking up conversations with folks."
The NJEA dismissed any work by O'Keefe saying the 26-year-old is "completely and utterly discredited."

"It’s James O’Keefe and that’s all you need to know," said NJEA spokesman Steve Baker, citing O'Keefe's legal troubles in the past.
I have my doubts about the NJEA and frankly find them completely discredited after watching these videos.  Be sure to watch the video where the NJEA official explains their involvement in rigging elections.  Chris Christie is right. "And if you need an example of what I’ve been talking about for the last nine months about how the teachers’ union leadership is out of touch with the people and out of control, go watch this video. It’s enlightening, it’s enraging.”

Monday, October 25, 2010

What do liberal elites discuss over craft beers, wine and cheese?

"What the hell happened to Barack Obama", that's what they discuss.  Well, actually they pretend to analyze what went wrong with Obama.  Never waste a crisis and all that; the elitists use the event instead to probe the Tea Party under a microscope:
Prospects for an American Neofascism. Initially the project would consist of a review of recent research on American right wing groups (including the Tea Party movement, the Minutemen, and the Christian right); and of trends in national and transnational political economy that bear on our subject (such as cyclical and structural economic crises, corporate/government interpenetration, and the explosive growth of the military/industrial/security complex).

A Macro-Micro Model of Participation in Political Action: The Tea Party and Cognitive Biases in Information Consumption and Processing. Hypotheses were tested using qualitative data obtained from interviews with two groups: protest participants from various Tea Party protests (protesting group, N-15) and non-protesting Tea Party "supporters" (supporting group, N=3). Results show that strongly held pre-existing beliefs (particularly economic and political individualist ideology) heavily impacted levels of dissatisfaction with government policy and choices of information consumed.
Naturally, the head-up-the-arse crew must analyze whether or not we are dangerous:
"I wonder if we're likely to see a Timothy McVeigh situation," says Nicholas Robert, an attendee originally from Australia, who basically wonders if any Tea Partiers can be arrested. "It seems to be that we're being very polite. I wonder if there are any legal mechanisms—one that comes to mind are the provisions used to crush the Wobblies."
Donald Douglas dispels this nonsense deftly ;)
The Wobblies. It was a Democrat administration that crushed them, and the ideological crises in Germany following shortly thereafter --- exacerbated by the Wilson administration's failed peace at Versailles --- helped give rise to the far right-wing extremism that elevated the Nazis to power in the 1930s. And here we have National Socialists in Berkeley calling for the exact same kind of repression. The difference is that the Wobblies were real communists and subversives. Today' tea partiers --- not so much.
Perhaps Donald could host a symposium on  A Macro-Micro Model of Putrefaction in Liberal Elites: Cognitive Biases in Information Consumption and Processing in the Terminally Anal-Ensnared Eggheads



There's something about Scalia

Liberal women just can't resist:
According to two witnesses, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia took fellow Justice Elena Kagan out for a lesson in skeet shooting at his shooting club in Virginia last week.

The witnesses saw Scalia at the Fairfax Rod and Gun Club, where he is a member, around noon on Wednesday of last week. He was with a woman who was noticeably diminutive in height, like Kagan, who stands at about five feet three inches. The witnesses, who got a very close look at the pair, say that the woman was the newest Supreme Court Justice.

Babalu blog fears the worst for Scalia, a la "Dick Cheney hunting accident:"
Maybe it's just me (We tend to be a bit more paranoid up here in Ohio. Has something to do with being stuck in our caves for 1/3 of the year), but as soon as I read the title of this one I thought, "It was one of those unfortunate accidents...", a la Dick Cheney, a lawyer and a brace of ducks.
The liberal Wonk Room fears for Kagan, a la "Dick Cheney hunting accident:"
Apparently, one of the privileges of joining the Supreme Court is a free shooting lesson from Justice Scalia. Hopefully Scalia’s aim is better than his hunting partners.


Via Memeorandum

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Lies, damned lies and White House white boards

Keith Hennessey debunks the White House mythos their economic policies have put the economy and jobs in "D" pulling us out of that nasty Republican ditch.    This video is long, so grab a Slurpee and sit back while Hennessey speaks from behind Austan Goolsbee's white board. I promise this will be time well spent:




Now be sure to watch 6-year-old Josh make mincemeat of the Obama tax increases:



Thanks to Jimmie Bise at the Sundries Shack for linking!!

Further proof Sidney Harman was robbed

Via Memeorandum

Sidney who?  Funny you should ask.  Sidney Harman, who recently paid $1 for Newsweek , was robbed.  The evidence  comes in form of a poll as worthless as the rag that published it:

Despite doom-saying about Democrats’ chances in the midterms, the latest NEWSWEEK Poll (full results) shows that they remain in a close race with Republicans 12 days before Election Day, while the president’s approval ratings have climbed sharply. The poll finds that 48 percent of registered voters would be more likely to vote for Democrats, compared with 42 percent who lean Republican (those numbers are similar to those in the last NEWSWEEK Poll, which found Democrats favored 48 percent to 43 percent). President Obama’s approval ratings have jumped substantially, crossing the magic halfway threshold to 54 percent, up from 48 percent in late September, while the portion of respondents who disapprove of the president dropped to 40 percent, the lowest disapproval rating in a NEWSWEEK Poll since February 2010. 
There is some evidence Senate polls may be tightening , yet credible left-leaning analysts wouldn't say Democrats have made a comeback.  None of this matters in the fantasy world where Newsweek exists, however.  Newsweek's rigorous methodology and stringent analysis finds "voters give Democrats higher marks for their handling of a range of issues, including the war in Afghanistan, health care, taxes, and unemployment."  Unemployment??  Newsweek readers must be presumed to exist in Kool-Aid comas while Rainbow Skittles are fed continuously through IV drip.   


Alright,  so maybe they are in a coma and so are the people interviewed for this poll.  The most difficult part of a pollster's job, in this midterm election, involves predicting who is likely to vote.   All credible polls must be analyzed with a sharp eye toward their turnout model and their likely voter screen.  Newsweek's likely voters are um, to put it nicely, cheap dates.  In the "record-shattering"  2008 election  that delivered unto us the crowned prince of Hope and Change, 61% of registered voters cast a ballot.  Newsweek randomly sampled a group that will have over 91% of registered voters beating a path to the ballot box:  
Telephone interviews were conducted with a nationally representative sample of 1,005 adults, age 18 years and over, including 672 adults reached on a landline telephone and 333 adults reached on a cell phone. The overall margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points for results based on 1,005 adults. Results based on smaller subgroups are subject to larger margins of sampling error. The margin of error is plus or minus 4.2 percentage points for results based on 848 registered voters and plus or minus 4.3 percentage points for results based on 773 likely voters.
When they are all done voting, they will immediately be reconnected to their Kool-Aid/Skittle IV drip.  Meanwhile the crowned prince of Hope and Change and his trusty sidekick will head off to India to heal the planet  and cause a few oceans to recede along the way.  Oh yeah - and I am Morgan Fairchild - that's the ticket.


Thursday, October 21, 2010

Moe Tucker takes off the velvet gloves

and lets the Obama administration have it with both barrels:
My family was damn poor when I was growing up on Long Island. There were no food stamps, no Medicaid, no welfare. If you were poor, you were poor. You didn't have a TV, you didn't have five pairs of shoes, you didn't have Levi's, you didn't have a phone; you ate Spam, hot dogs and spaghetti. We all survived! I am not against food stamps, welfare or Medicaid, if only they would oversee these programs properly!

I am also against the government taking over the student loan program, car companies, bailouts and the White House taking control of the census (what the hell is that all about?); [about] any First Lady telling (I know, I know, "suggesting to") us what to eat, the mayor of New York City declaring "no salt" (screw you, pal!), the mayor/city commissioners of Anytown, U.S.A. declaring you can't fly a flag, can't say the Pledge of Allegiance and can't sing the National Anthem. I'm against a President dismissing any and all who dare to disagree; the water being turned off in (central) California, at [an] area where they've turned off the water because they want to save a one-inch fish -- turning that huge area of farming land into another dustbowl -- the insipid start of food supply control methinks! The government deciding what kind of lightbulbs we can use (all you "think green" people, three objections to this b.s.: 1) Those bulbs give off the light of a candle; 2) They're very expensive; 3) They have mercury in them - how the hell are we supposed to dispose of them?).

I am against the government now thinking about bailing out unions. The unions made the contracts which include insane pensions; the U.S. government didn't. I'm against the government closing down offshore drilling in the Gulf with one hand and with the other giving (lending?) Brazil money to help them do way deeper offshore drilling -- rather curious. I'm against a government that will not defend our borders; and on and on and on.

Imagine that, a Tea Party patriot the liberals have trouble hating. Gawker calls her interview "pretty great," and notes Tucker is the best thing the Tea Party has going for it. Don't bet on it, Tucker believes there are many more like her: "I'm sure there are plenty of conservatives in the music/art world since I don't believe there's any group, club, organization or profession in which all members think exactly the same." I guess Moe doesn't watch MSNBC - but really - who counts them anyway? There is much more so read the rest. Word of caution - moderate language warning applies to this link. I would note though, the single "f bomb" in the piece is probably the best quote. Nevertheless, for those who mind you were warned.


Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Dem Shenanigans in Pennsylvania

First, via JWF  and Memeorandum comes confirmation of suspicions I have reported in the past, Bryan Lentz, Dem candidate for PA07 is busted:
A Pennsylvania Democratic House candidate on Tuesday admitted to helping a third Tea Party candidate get on the ballot who he hopes will siphon votes away from his Republican opponent.

Bryan Lentz, the Democratic nominee running for the seat being vacated by Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.), said that he knew that volunteers from his campaign helped Tea Party candidate Jim Schneller.

"If somebody's already made the decision to run, I didn't think that 'helping' with the process of signature petitions was improper," Lentz told told the Delaware County Daily Times editorial board in an interview.

Republicans have accused Democrats of helping set up Tea Party candidates as spoilers in several House and Senate races around the country. Democrats face a tough political environment this fall, when they are trying to maintain their congressional majorities against a GOP wave spurred in part by Tea Party groups.

Lentz said he could not remember when he learned of his volunteers' work on behalf of Schneller, but he said "I didn't think it was a bad thing for the process or for my candidacy."

Republican nominee Pat Meehan and Lentz are locked in a tight race, The Hill's 2010 Midterm Poll last week showed last week that Meehan is narrowly leading Lentz 40-39 percent.

Meehan's campaign responded to the Lentz's claim in the Philadelphia Inquirer.

"It's about time Bryan Lentz would admit what the media has been reporting on for months," said Meehan campaign manager Bryan Kendro. "Despite his efforts to fool voters about his role in supporting Schneller's candidacy, he was forced to come clean, and he should apologize for not being forthright."
If he didn't think it was improper then why did he try to cover it up?  If he would fool the voters now imagine what he would do in Washington.

Next, via Jim Geraghty, Lentz would fit right in with Patrick Murphy (D-PA08) who obviously thought he would take a final crack at fooling voters:
Workers at Bucks County's voter registration office fielded 70 calls on Tuesday and dozens more this past week from residents worried they wouldn't be able to vote on Election Day.

The reason: a series of Democratic Party absentee ballot letters -- under the letterhead of the fictitious Pennsylvania Voter Assistance Office -- warning recipients that their ability to vote in November could be threatened.

"They are concerned because, number one they think it is from us, and number two they don't understand why they are receiving it," said Deena Dean, director of Bucks County's election office. "They don't understand why their participation in the upcoming election might be in jeopardy."

Republicans blasted the letters, with a spokesman calling them "deeply troubling."

Concerned about an "enthusiasm gap" with Republicans, Democrats are going to great lengths to urge their voters to cast ballots in the midterm election. In Bucks County, Democrats have a voter registration edge, but recent polls suggest 8th District Democratic U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy is trailing Republican Mike Fitzpatrick.

The Voter Assistance Office letters, spearheaded by the Bucks County Democratic Party, are part of the turnout effort.

The last of the three mailings warns the recipient that it is the "THIRD and FINAL notice.""By failing to return the enclosed documents, you may be placing your ability to participate in this year's general election at risk," the letter reads.
Read the rest of that sordid mess then take a shower.  If you have to threaten and coerce voters into returning an absentee ballot...  Oh never mind, this is business as usual for the Dems isn't it?  If they can't threaten enough people they'll just dig them up.

Despite consistent polling that has showed Republicans cleaning up in Pennsylvania, recent evidence suggests the polls are much tighter than they have appeared.  The Hill released a poll this morning that showed Murphy leading Fitzpatrick by three points.  This is well within the margin of error but it is the first independent poll showing Murphy in the lead.  Polls that show Fitzpatrick ahead are based on greater turnout by Republicans and Independents favoring Republican candidates.  It is all going to come down to who can turn out the vote. We know what lengths the Dems will go to turn their voters out, we must not be complacent.

I absolutely believe Fitzpatrick and Toomey will win but it is up to us to make that happen.  Fitzpatrick is holding a GOTV blow out event on Saturday.  More info on that available here.  Kitchen Table Patriots have many events scheduled and there is plenty to do at the Bucks County GOP Victory Center as well.  We need to turn out every vote to insure the election of Pat Toomey, Mike Fitzpatrick, Corbett and a slew of other great GOP candidates.  Let's Roll!

Raese leads WV Senate race by 7

Really good news from Rasmussen:
Republican John Raese has now opened up a seven-point lead over West Virginia Governor Joe Manchin in perhaps the most improbably close U.S. Senate contest in the country. It’s Raese’s biggest lead yet.
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely West Virginia Voters finds Raese with 50% support to Manchin’s 43%. Two percent (2%) like some other candidate in the race, and five percent (5%) are undecided.
The West Virginia race now shifts back from a Toss-Up to Leans Republican in the Rasmussen Reports Election 2010 Senate Balance of Power rankings.
West Virginia is incredibly important as certain partisan hacks are quick to point out:

It makes no sense for the people of West Virginia to send a Democrat to the Senate when they overwhelmingly oppose Obama and his agenda. The 111th Congress is still a serious threat to freedom, and may have more in store for America whatever happens on election day. Cap and Trade has already passed the House and would only require a vote in the Senate to become the law of the land.  Manchin could easily vote for cloture even if he voted against the final bill.  We've certainly seen the supposed moderate Dems pull that stunt in the past.

Beyond the lame duck session, Manchin, as a Democrat and junior Senator, would be under incredible pressure to support the Democratic agenda. No matter how many promises he makes to West Virginia now, the carrots and sticks of Dem leadership have proven to have a powerful hypnotic effect in the past and will again in the future. Moreover, Manchin is unwilling to commit to the repeal of ObamaCare despite the fact the people of West Virginia disapprove of the law in even greater numbers than we see nationally. There is really no reason to send this popular Governor to DC; nothing good can come of it.  Keep him at home.


And now an important campaign message from POTUS and FLOTUS

Live from a photo booth somewhere in the bowels of Organizing for America, Michelle and Barack offer an inspirational message to the minions. I am inclined to take their advice on this one. I don't know about you but I am pretty "fired up" and ready to "get in the game." Of course, I am not sure they would be thrilled with who I am "fired up" to fire November 2nd.




Is it me or does she look like she pulled her Halloween costume out for that video?  Was she dabbling in witchcraft I wonder?  One thing is certain, Obama has lost his magic and Spiegel Online mostly blames the H8ers and the crazy Congressional rules that stopped us from turning into Greece as quickly as we should have:
They are people so filled with vitriol they can no longer think straight -- people like television presenter Glenn Beck, who says that putting the common good first is "exactly the kind of talk that led to the death camps in Germany." Beck has millions of followers, and appears in public with former Alaskan governor Sarah Palin, the darling of the Tea Party movement, who gleefully pronounces Obama's middle name Hussein as if it were a naughty, menacing word. Just two years ago, such things would have been taboo, and considered below-the-belt by Republicans.

This is the new atmosphere in America, and it is reflected in the Senate and the House of Representatives, two self-confident bodies populated by two political parties that eagerly take turns holding the reins of power. They paralyze themselves with rules that demand unattainable majorities for everything that is important. And even the Constitution irrevocably decrees that a senator from sparsely-populated Alaska has the same rights as a senator from New York.

The German media alternate on a daily basis between talking about "Obama's victory" and calling him a "loser." But often neither view is accurate, because the president has little or no influence over much of what is done, or not done, in the US and its 50 federal states.
Poor POTUS he is practically helpless isn't he?  No wonder he can't govern this ungovernable mob of haters. Jeepers, you would think a couple thousand miles of ocean might give a guy a bit of objectivity. Alas no, when you form your impressions of the state of hate in the US through the eyes of the New York Times this is the sort of insightful analysis that follows.

In fairness, Klaus Brinkbäumer is critical of Obama as well. In Brinkbaumer's opinion, Obama should have at least tried to be the  messiah he pretended to be in the campaign. I guess he should have parted the oceans before he pretended to cause them to recede. With a wave of his wand those crazy Congressional rules would vanish and we the hateful would have a plague of locusts set upon us.  Memo to Herr Brinkbäumer, we happen to think that crazy Congress was a plague of locusts.  But really, is it any of his business anyway?

Dave Harsanyi rallies to the defense of "We the Bitter Clingers."  Grab your Slurpee and enjoy:
The enlightened trust science. That's why the president appointed a science czar, people. A science czar who co-authored a textbook arguing for a mass sterilization of Americans to prevent an imagined population bomb. You know, "science."

God has no place in this faith. That's not to say that Yahweh has anything on our president, who once claimed future generations will see his election -- Goliath government -- as the point in history when we finally started "healing the sick" and "the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal."

Now, that's the kind of faith-inflected lingo we slack-jawed yokels can comprehend. Otherwise, the left's plans are just too darn complex for us to appreciate.

"Part of the reason that our politics seems so tough right now," Obama recently explained, "and facts and science and argument (do) not seem to be winning the day all the time is because we're hard-wired not to always think clearly when we're scared. And the country is scared." (Wait. If we're hard-wired to be confused and we're confused, isn't science winning the day? It's all so perplexing.)

Science can explain all, including how bitter, frightened, clingy voters aren't grateful enough.

Or -- and I realize this is probably crazy talk -- voters aren't scared; they have just been paying attention and are turning to candidates who, though far less than perfect and not always sophisticated, better reflect their sensibilities.
Read the rest and then go Be the WAVE ye Bitter Clingers - Be the WAVE


Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Reading tea leaves in the Nevada early vote


From the crystal ball at Politico:
Early-voting numbers out of Nevada’s two biggest counties could spell trouble for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in his tough contest against Republican Sharron Angle.

In Reno’s Washoe County and Las Vegas’s Clark County, Republican turnout was disproportionately high over the first three voting days, according to local election officials. The two counties together make up 86 percent of the state’s voter population.

The sparsely populated counties outside Clark and Washoe, which have yet to report complete early-voting results, are strongly Republican.
One obvious problem with early voting is it tends to tell Dems how many dead voters they need to dig up on election day.   Still, the early vote confirms that Republicans are enthusiastic and shows Independents breaking for Republicans.  This was not the case in 2008:
Statewide, Democrats have an edge of about 60,000 registered voters more than Republicans, but that represents a decline from 2008, when their advantage was over 100,000.

The Democratic turnout machine that powered President Obama to a 12-percentage-point victory in Nevada was kept in place after the 2008 election to work for Reid's reelection this year. But early figures in the first few days of the 2008 voting strongly favored Democrats.

"Harry Reid has spent millions of dollars on the Nevada Democratic Party turnout machine, and it's really, really good," Erwin, the GOP consultant, said. "But with independents breaking heavily for Republicans, Democrats are going to have to overperform their registration advantage to win this year."
Let's not give Democrats a chance to overperform their registration please.  It's time to close the deal and send Senator Angle to DC.  Be the wave help Sharron GOTV

Allahpundit has more as does Memeorandum

Monday, October 18, 2010

Carville's Hurricane Scale: A guide to Democratic devastation

H/T Hot Air Headlines

George Stephanopoulos pulls the headline, "Carville Concedes: Pelosi May Be Out Even if Dems Hold On," from the interview embedded below with James Carville.  An interesting thought but honestly, it seems incredibly unlikely Democrats hold on to the House at this point. Carville almost concedes as much himself and finds the best case scenario for Dems is one in which Dems hold on to power by a scant few votes.
As you will see in the video, Carville predicts there would be plenty of party-switching deals bandied about behind closed doors. That is the type of "fun" Democratic pollsters and pundits like Carville are dreaming of these days speaks volumes about how far the mighty Democrats have fallen in a mere two years.

I found the rest of Carville's analysis much more interesting frankly. Granted, I like these tea-leaf reading discussions anyway but Carville offers an interesting insight in this one. He offers us a scale to determine, from a Dem perspective, what constitutes a wipe out this year. They are going to spin like tops afterward so I thought it would be useful to have this scale for comparisons sake.  As a native of New Orleans, it somehow seems fitting Carville converts the standard hurricane scale to size up the best and worst cases for Dems. Note the scale starts at Category 3, which on the Saffir-Simpson Scale describes a hurricane that produces devastating damage. None of this is pretty for Dems:
Category 3 hurricane: “30-40” Dem losses in the House. “And in the Senate you’re looking at maybe five Senate seats. That’s the best you can look for.”

Category 4: “Lose 40 to 50 seats, that’s a Category 4.” “You hang on to some things, you know Carl Paladino won’t win.” (And Democrats hold Senate, losing 8-9 seats)

Category 5: “If we lose 56 or better, that’s a Category 5. Then you’re going to be looking at 11 Republican Senators.”
 I still have a hard time seeing the Republicans picking up the Senate but have no trouble believing the Democrats will lose over 50 seats. It will be interesting to see if Carville's prediction holds true. Given how close the toss-up seats are these days in the Senate contests, it does seem plausible the Senate will follow the historical trend in wave elections and flip along with the House.   In other words, the wave gets the deciding vote.

Personally, I am not looking forward to Photoshopping Chuck Schumer into the new Wicked Witch on this blog.  I am rooting for the Category 5 storm scenario.  If the latest Gallup generic ballot holds true I might just get my wish.




More on Gallup at Memeorandum

Be sure to read the adventures of The Other McCain and Da Tech Guy  who are reporting from PA-10 tonight.  This is their first stop in what McCain calls "Ground Zero" if the "Big Red Wave hits:"
Pennsylvania’s 10th District is the first stop on this tour that’s actually rated “leans Republican,” and the most recent poll shows Republican Tom Marino leading 44-38 over Democrat Chris Carney. Currently, five Democrat-held seats in this state – PA-3, PA-5, PA-8, PA-10 and PA-11 – are rated “lean Republican” by Real Clear Politics, so if the Big Red Wave hits on Nov. 2, Pennsylvania will be Ground Zero.

Voters don't trust Democrats with much these days

Rasmussen updates its' tracking of public trust on key issues with just 2 weeks to go before the election. The poll of 1000 likely voters showed pretty clearly voters aren't inclined to trust Democrats with much of anything. Here are the numbers:

On the key issue driving voters to the polls this year, voters trust Republicans with handling the economy by 10 points.  Notice too, the issue where voters give Republicans the largest margin, immigration.  No wonder endangered Democrats are quietly befuddled by Obama's more outrageous political positions in this important election season.

Democrats have a slight edge when it comes to the issue of education and government ethics.  This represents something of a drop for Republicans who held a lead on all ten issues in August.  I would guess some of this could be statistical noise, though you certainly have to wonder whether voters missed the Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters scandals.  No doubt they would have been more attuned to the corruption had these scandals involved Republicans, as the national media would have been beating those scandals like a drum.

Still, the overall trend for Democrats is noticeably downward.  Two years ago, before Democrats took control of the White House and gained significant majorities in the House and Senate, voters trusted Democrats over Republicans on all 10 issues.  All this tends to prove Ann Coulter's theory correct:
As a result, for the past four decades, American politics has consisted of Republicans controlling Washington for eight to 14 years -- either from the White House or Capitol Hill -- thus allowing Americans to forget what it was they didn't like about Democrats, whom they then carelessly vote back in. The Democrats immediately remind Americans what they didn't like about Democrats, and their power is revoked at the voters' first possible opportunity. 
That first possible opportunity is a scant two weeks away - revoke away voters.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Obama looking like a one-termer says......

Mickey Kaus fears Obama's latest blame-fest might be a "sign after he gets clobbered he won't be able to adjust and turn the setback into a longterm victory the way Bill Clinton did."  That Barack Obama seems utterly incapable of tacking to the center has seemed fairly obvious for some time.  What did he do when Scott Brown won that coveted "Ted Kennedy" seat in Massachusetts after all?

Still, Kaus would prefer Obama making the decisions, especially health care decisions, than "85% of "the likely Republican candidates" so it shouldn't be surprising that Kaus is just awakening to this discovery.  Kaus did have a warning sign however, which he discounted until now:
A few weeks ago a right-wing reporter told me that worried Dem congresspersons who met with Obama left their meetings more worried than when they went in. I discounted the gossip, but now it's begining to ring true. We thought he was a great salesman. He turned out to be a lousy salesmen. We thought he was a great politician. Instead he makes elementary mistakes and doesn't learn from them. He didn't know "shovel-ready" from a hole in the ground, and then somehow thinks admitting this ignorance without apology will add to his appeal.
While Kaus was one of the few to report Obama's shovel-ready admission wasn't exactly news, he does seem to have missed the news that people are afraid Obama doesn't know much of anything from a hole in the ground.  But Kaus is correct, Obama's latest efforts to blame the voters is probably worse than his "bitter clingers" faux pas from the campaign:
It's one thing to say those poor people in Pennsylvania are hostile to gay rights, say, because all their "jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them"—and that they'll change when they get the jobs back.  It's another thing to say those poor people will change when they get their jobs back when you've had two years to get them their jobs back and have conspicuously failed. At that point, blaming "false consciousness" becomes a semi-delusional way of dancing around your own inability to remove the root of that false consciousness. A little humility is in order. If true humility is unavailable, false humility will do.
At least in the campaign Obama limited himself to criticizing Pennsylvanians only; here he expands it across the country in order to avoid facing his inabilities.  As Pundette points out: "He's working overtime not to get this: The trauma is Obama! And the massive rejection of his pernicious agenda is proof that plenty of responsible Americans are thinking clearly and acting rationally, at last."  While Kaus is correct that humility is in order, I disagree that false humility will do.   I think voters have had just about enough of the smoke and mirrors Obama.

Perhaps Obama will find his humility in the face of a sound electoral defeat in November.  If I were a betting woman though, I would bet against that.  What Mr. Kaus and Mr. Obama have missed seems a bit obvious here; it was the passage of health care that proved their agenda more important than the opinion and well-being of the American people.  It wasn't the lousy messaging or the lousy salesman-turned-armchair-psychologist that prevented us from loving health care.  Doesn't that conclusion fundamentally insult the voters too?  Were we really just a successful sales pitch away from being sold on the Shamwow health care law?  I doubt it.

Here is the harsh reality, we are quite possibly eleven years away from reaching pre-recession employment rates according to the Brookings Institute.  This is the rosy scenario mind you; it could indeed be quite a bit longer than that.  Who sincerely believes that imposing a massive health care law on businesses let alone each and every US citizen was going to spur that rosy scenario along?  Mr. Obama would need to bend himself prostrate and beg forgiveness before those unemployed in 2012 before anyone would really think they saw something close to humility and then, I would guess, most would conclude it was false.  Obama is indeed looking like a one-termer Mr. Kaus.  Unfortunately for America, there will have been many many people stripped of their jobs, homes and dignity long before anyone gets health care coverage in 2014.  Was it really worth it?

More on this at Memeorandum

Time to crumble some Democratic cookies

With just 15 days to go before the most important election I can remember Right Change put together a video as a reminder why elections matter NOW. The video runs about one minute long and is based on the William J.H. Boetcker quote from the "you cannot" quote from the early 1900's:
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatreds.
You cannot establish security on borrowed money.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away a man's initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.
William J. H. Boetcker, 1916 (often attributed to Lincoln)

You Cannot! from RightChange on Vimeo.

Here is another thing you cannot do,  you cannot give a Democrat a cookie:


If You Give a Democrat a Cookie from RightChange on Vimeo.

November 2, 2010 - time to crumble some Democratic cookies


Friday, October 15, 2010

McMahon closing the gap in Connecticut

The latest Rasmussen:
Democrat Richard Blumenthal now leads Republican Linda McMahon by just five points in Connecticut’s race for the U.S. Senate in a survey conducted two nights after their third and final head-to-head debate.

The latest Rasmussen Reports statewide telephone survey of Likely Voters shows Blumenthal, Connecticut’s longtime attorney general, picking up 51% of the vote. McMahon, the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment, earns the vote from 46%. One percent (1%) prefer some other candidate, while three percent (3%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

The latest numbers move the race from Solid Democrat to Leans Democrat in the Rasmussen Reports Election 2010 Senate Balance of Power rankings.

Just over a week ago, Blumenthal opened a 54% to 43% lead over McMahon the night after their first debate. While the race was closer in several surveys since January, Blumenthal has always held the lead. In 13 surveys this year, the Democrat has drawn 47% to 60% of the vote. McMahon has picked up 31% to 46% support during that same period.

The polling in this race is volatile but considering that Rasmussen shows the race tightening over the last week, I will take this as a sign of movement towards McMahon. This race is one that many were starting to write off and it still may be a long shot. There is ample reason to be hopeful, however. Blumenthal is truly an awful candidate. His awful response to McMahon's question, "how do you create a job" should have been the kiss of death in this economic environment. This is CT though and Connecticut voters seem to have a high tolerance for Blumenthal and his propensity to "misspeak." So egregious have been Blumenthal's outright deceptions on his military record, or lack thereof, that even noted lefty loons like Chris Matthews find him tough to like.  Maybe CT voters are starting to second guess him as well.


Thursday, October 14, 2010

Whoopi and Joy forgot their meds this morning

There is a lot of buzz on Twitter about this clip and for good reason. We all know Whoopi and Joy have a penchant for da crazy but their hissy fit on air this morning during an interview with Bill O'Reilly is a sight to see. While discussing the Ground Zero Mosque O'Reilly argues that it was Muslims who drove the planes. He failed, however, to make the distinction that it was Muslim extremists which led to Whoopi and Joy walking off the set. this was such an overreaction that even Barbara Walters had to chastise her colleagues for their unprofessional behavior. O'Reilly clarified his point and shortly afterwards we see the return of Joy and Whoopi. What a show:








"It’s racist, it’s homophobic, and it’s really cowardly.”

It's a billboard that dares to criticize the One:


So a full scale investigation of the artist and the potential patron of the critical billboard ensues, natch:
While it’s unknown who paid for the billboard, the artist is Loma resident Paul Snover.

“I am not allowed to say who (paid for it) at this time,” Snover said in an e-mail Tuesday. “If it had been me, I would have included the Republicans as part of the problem.”

Still, Snover’s political views are well-known. An Internet search of the self-described “constitutionalist libertarian” revealed numerous blog postings in which he talks about his support for tea party and 9/12 groups.

“The Constitution has been thrown in the trash and burned by our very own government and we the people watched TV while America burned! The enemy is not at the gate, it is a cancer within our own borders,” Snover wrote on the Mesa County Second Amendment Task Force website. “From what I have learned of history and what I see going on in all levels of government, I can but conclude that there is no constitutional republic any more, only a sick tyrannical twisted dictatorship. “

Mesa County Democratic Party Chairwoman Martelle Daniels called the billboard racist and homophobic, while her GOP counterpart, Mesa County Republican Party Chairman Chuck Pabst, called it “juvenile.”
It's also called free speech which is something that is beyond reproach when an artist uses bodily waste to depict the Virgin Mary or Jesus.  Heck, the government has even paid for that "art" in the past.  And, of course, we all know how the left was completely respectful in their criticism of Bush don't we?  I am sure there were news articles condemning all the hate speech - somewhere - if you come across one let me know.

Via Memeorandum

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Live Stream Chile Mine Rescue

Michelle Malkin has full coverage of the earliest rescues. She also offers this important tribute to the American man who is a true hero in this amazing rescue:
In a different day and age, Jeff Hart would be the most famous American in our country right now. He would be honored at the White House. Schoolchildren would learn of his skill and heroism. But because Jeff Hart works in an industry under fire by the Obama administration, more people in Chile will celebrate this symbol of American greatness than in America itself.
Jeff Hart is a driller based in my home state of Colorado. The father of two has been drilling water wells in Afghanistan at U.S. Army bases. When the San Jose Mine in Chile collapsed in August, he flew to lend his renowned expertise to the rescue effort. As part of an amazing three-way race to the trapped miners, Hart drilled for 33 days straight and was first to reach the caved-in workers. The AP recounts the story — and what strikes me again and again is how the world turned to American ingenuity and American fortitude and American equipment and American enterprise to get the job done:
Read the rest, she has plenty more.

The Sundries Shack offers a little humor.
Pat in Shreveport does a live blog and will update as news breaks on the rescue.
Also The Anchoress posts on the second man rescued who returned bearing gifts.

Much more on Memeorandum as well
Live Stream beneath the jump

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Cook puts 5 more Dem seats in play

The more the merrier:

Add Raul Grijalva, Solomon Ortiz, Jim Oberstar, BARNEY FRANK, and Ben Ray Lujan.  Oh and did I mention Barney Frank, oh happy day.  The Other McCain  covered the Frank/Bielat debate while Da Tech Guy tells us Cook will soon need a new category for Massachusetts:

In three weeks it will be upgraded to “Holy S&#!”

If Christine O'Donnell can't win ............ UPDATED New Ad "Tax Man"

Then why is the DSCC sending reinforcements to Delaware for Coons?
Is the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee a bit concerned about the potential impact of the Tea Party in Delaware or have the Democrats completely written off Carol Shea-Porter running for New Hampshire’s 1st Congressional District?

I ask because the Democrats have sent the lady who was on the ground running operations for Carol Shea-Porter’s congressional bid to Delaware to be the Field Director for Chris Coons canvassing operation.
Naturally this also means Carol Shea-Porter joins the ranks of lost-cause Dems recently removed from life support:
As Republicans made new investments in at least 10 races across the country, including two Democratic seats here in eastern Ohio, Democratic leaders took steps to pull out of some races entirely or significantly cut their financial commitment in several districts that the party won in the last two election cycles.

Representatives Steve Driehaus of Ohio, Suzanne M. Kosmas of Florida and Kathy Dahlkemper of Pennsylvania were among the Democrats who learned that they would no longer receive the same infusion of television advertising that party leaders had promised. Party strategists conceded that these races and several others were slipping out of reach.
Good thing these folks voted for that death panel isn't it?  It doesn't look as though there will be a call from the Governor to save the  Dead Dems Walking so they might as well try to save Coons skin while it still looks like it can be saved.  Naturally Dems would prefer to pour resources into a reliably liberal vote like Coons as opposed to say the  Governor of West Virginia who never met a Dem agenda item he didn't suddenly find toxic.  It is only a matter of time before the voters of Delaware figure out Coons will be a rubber stamp for that agenda.  Rubber stamp votes for the Obama agenda seem to have a short shelf life these days.  I would say it is time for another poll in Delaware.

UPDATE:  Ask and you shall receive:

The latest Fox/Pulse poll of 1000 Likely Delaware voters doesn't hold much hope for O'Donnell. It really doesn't show any movement towards O'Donnell at this point. Moreover, O'Donnell's support appears a bit softer than does Coons' support. Unless Dems are seeing something different in internals, which seems unlikely, Democrats appear to be funneling resources into the state to preserve a win. O'Donnell needs to shake things up here and soon.

And again ask and you shall receive.  Here is the latest O'Donnell campaign ad which looks like it has the potential to shake things up:


Related Posts with Thumbnails
 
Web Analytics